Cisco Catalyst and Cisco Nexus compete in the switching market, with Catalyst leading in security and ease of deployment, while Nexus excels in data centers with scalability.
Features: Cisco Catalyst Switches offer extensive security features including Port Security and VLAN, support stacking and port channels to boost reliability and capacity, and provide PoE with perpetual PoE for stability. Cisco Nexus is known for its high port density and scalability, featuring VPC and a focus on flexibility and data center use.
Room for Improvement: Cisco Catalyst lacks expansion slots and future upgrade support, needing better configurability and interfaces. Cisco Nexus faces challenges with complex licensing and requires better integration and documentation support.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Catalyst and Nexus are primarily deployed on-premises. Catalyst is easier to deploy due to user-friendly features and consistent design, backed by reliable support. Nexus faces slower support responsiveness but offers strong documentation.
Pricing and ROI: Both Catalyst and Nexus are premium with high costs, justified by their features and reliability. ROI is typically seen within three to five years, though Nexus users find its complex licensing challenging.
From an investment standpoint, deploying Cisco Catalyst Switches offers tangible benefits, including cost reductions.
Speeding up our response times and reducing errors and incidents with automation and available APIs.
Cisco support is very good and responsive.
Cisco's support is good, one of the best supports that you will get.
I am paying for Cisco support and would rate it nine out of ten.
For us, we have a time advantage because we know the solution, and the technological refresh is easier.
The scalability of Cisco Catalyst Switches is very much scalable, as it supports the stacking feature and growth; for instance, with 94K modular switches, based on the requirement, we can even increase modules for more bandwidth.
Cisco Catalyst Switches are scalable, and I would rate them eight to nine out of ten for scalability.
Cisco Catalyst Switches are stable.
Initially, the stability of Cisco Nexus, particularly with the ACI, was problematic due to unstable codes, requiring replacements.
Currently, I don't see much AI integration with Cisco Catalyst Switches; though they've started, it still needs improvement.
Cisco Catalyst Switches could be a little bit cheaper as they are very costly.
There could be improvements in the repeat configuration with some file integration that is currently missing.
When I talk about data centers, which are critical infrastructure and centralized application hubs, the Nexus platforms should be highly stable.
The solution is on-premises and stable.
Cisco provides unique features that justify their pricing.
Cisco usually is costly compared to other vendors.
Cisco Catalyst Switches are quite pricey.
The price of Cisco Nexus is on the higher side due to the premium services Cisco offers.
All solutions are very expensive and not an economy solution.
Cisco Catalyst Switches are valuable for their reliability and performance.
Catalyst Switches are efficient and swift, which is valuable for my organization.
The most beneficial features for our network management are their stability and good customer support.
It provides visibility and configuration options, aiding significantly in network management initiatives.
For us, we have a time advantage because we know the solution, and the technological refresh is easier.
Cisco Catalyst Switches are a reliable and scalable network switching and routing solution, focusing on VLANs and VLAN switching. They are used as access switches, distribution switches, and core switches in various environments, deployed on-premises, and used for long connections. The switches are easy to configure, install, and upgrade and offer good pricing.Â
The most valuable features include warranty and firmware support, stability, security, good performance, flexibility, etc. The Cisco Catalyst Switches have provided a stable solution for the organizations and are widely used, trusted, and well-known in the networking industry.
We monitor all LAN Switching reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
