Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Cisco Umbrella based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Quad9, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, and Zscaler Internet Access.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Cisco Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Cisco, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Cisco Umbrella excels in advanced threat intelligence and enterprise-level features, supporting large environments with structured deployment and customer service. In comparison, Quad9 offers free security with robust threat blocking, appealing to cost-conscious users prioritizing essential protection without extensive support.
Cisco Umbrella offers robust DNS protection, is easy to deploy, and provides value with flexible pricing. In comparison, Prisma Access offers comprehensive security integration including firewalls and zero-trust features, appealing for businesses needing advanced protection, despite higher costs and configuration complexity.
Cisco Umbrella offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks is perceived as having a more complex setup that might incur higher initial expenses.
Cisco Umbrella offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks is perceived as having a more complex setup that might incur higher initial expenses.
Zscaler Internet Access offers strong web traffic security, highlighted by advanced SSL inspection and cloud sandboxing. In comparison, Cisco Umbrella emphasizes DNS-based protection and domain visibility, appealing to those needing seamless API integration and comprehensive threat detection.
Zscaler Internet Access features a streamlined setup process with a slightly higher initial cost, while Cisco Umbrella offers a lower setup cost but may require more configuration effort.
Zscaler Internet Access features a streamlined setup process with a slightly higher initial cost, while Cisco Umbrella offers a lower setup cost but may require more configuration effort.
Lookout specializes in mobile endpoint security with an affordable pricing model. In comparison, Cisco Umbrella offers extensive network security features such as DNS-layer security. Lookout's ease of deployment suits mobile environments, while Cisco Umbrella's comprehensive features cater to large-scale network protection.
Cisco Umbrella provides robust DNS-based security with ease of deployment, appealing to organizations seeking straightforward management. In comparison, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange offers a comprehensive security range like advanced threat protection, attracting those needing extensive secure internet access solutions.
Cisco Umbrella offers a straightforward setup process with minimal costs, while Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform might require more initial investment, highlighting a key pricing difference between the two solutions.
Cisco Umbrella offers a straightforward setup process with minimal costs, while Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform might require more initial investment, highlighting a key pricing difference between the two solutions.
Cisco Umbrella enhances security and compliance through DNS protection and custom web filtering, appealing to organizations needing ease of deployment. In comparison, iboss provides extensive network traffic scanning and cloud proxy features, attracting those seeking strong integration with SASE and competitive pricing.
Cisco Umbrella is ideal for enterprises prioritizing centralized DNS protection and web content filtering. In comparison, Cloudflare One is suitable for those needing DDoS protection paired with CDNs. Cisco Umbrella is pricier but comprehensive, while Cloudflare One offers cost-effective, easy integration-focused solutions.
Cisco Umbrella entails a lower setup cost, highlighting its affordability; in contrast, Cloudflare One presents a higher initial investment, pointing to its robust features.
Cisco Umbrella entails a lower setup cost, highlighting its affordability; in contrast, Cloudflare One presents a higher initial investment, pointing to its robust features.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps seamlessly integrates with Microsoft tools, enhancing visibility in cloud management. In comparison, Cisco Umbrella offers robust DNS-layer security with streamlined deployment. Tech buyers might prefer Defender for Microsoft environments or Umbrella for DNS security and ease of use.
Cisco Umbrella offers rapid deployment with DNS redirection and robust security features, appealing to those seeking simplicity. In comparison, Cato SASE Cloud Platform provides self-healing security with global coverage, appealing to buyers needing advanced firewall capabilities and seamless service integration for comprehensive protection.
Cisco Umbrella offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Cato SASE Cloud Platform may involve higher initial expenses due to its comprehensive cloud infrastructure setup.
Cisco Umbrella offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Cato SASE Cloud Platform may involve higher initial expenses due to its comprehensive cloud infrastructure setup.
Cisco Umbrella provides extensive web filtering and DNS-level protection, benefiting remote work settings. In comparison, Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection excels in advanced DNS security and management, offering detailed integration with IPAM systems for network management. Cisco Umbrella's flexible deployment outweighs Infoblox's focused on-premises option.
Cisco Umbrella attracts tech buyers with its DNS-layer security and detailed threat intelligence. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE impresses with its zero-trust access and protocol support, appealing to those valuing robust security features and comprehensive access controls in cloud environments.
Cisco Umbrella typically incurs higher initial setup costs compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, making cost efficiency a notable distinction between the two solutions.
Cisco Umbrella typically incurs higher initial setup costs compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, making cost efficiency a notable distinction between the two solutions.
Cisco Umbrella excels in DNS security with flexible licensing and strong customer service. In comparison, FortiSASE offers competitive pricing in education with minimal local processing needs, appealing to smaller organizations. Cisco's robust features justify premium pricing, while FortiSASE provides cost-effective, cloud-based solutions.
Cisco Umbrella has a lower setup cost compared to FortiSASE, making it a more budget-friendly option. FortiSASE, however, offers advanced features that might justify its higher setup cost for some users.
Cisco Umbrella has a lower setup cost compared to FortiSASE, making it a more budget-friendly option. FortiSASE, however, offers advanced features that might justify its higher setup cost for some users.
Cisco Umbrella excels in DNS-level security, offering comprehensive threat prevention for hybrid networks. In comparison, VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN focuses on performance with dynamic multipath optimization, appealing to businesses needing robust connectivity and efficient data transport.
Cisco Umbrella typically incurs higher setup costs compared to the budget-friendly VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN. This reflects significant differences in initial investment requirements between the two solutions.
Cisco Umbrella typically incurs higher setup costs compared to the budget-friendly VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN. This reflects significant differences in initial investment requirements between the two solutions.
Cisco Umbrella offers extensive DNS-layer security and threat intelligence, making it ideal for comprehensive network protection. In comparison, Twingate provides a software-defined perimeter, delivering seamless and secure remote access without requiring a VPN, appealing to businesses focusing on remote work efficiency.
Skyhigh Security excels in identifying shadow IT and offers comprehensive risk assessments, enhancing data loss prevention. In comparison, Cisco Umbrella emphasizes DNS security, blocking malware effectively; it provides visibility into user activities while integrating smoothly with other Cisco solutions, offering strong reporting capabilities.
Skyhigh Security has a lower setup cost than Cisco Umbrella, making it more economical upfront. In contrast, Cisco Umbrella may offer advanced features at a higher initial expense.
Skyhigh Security has a lower setup cost than Cisco Umbrella, making it more economical upfront. In contrast, Cisco Umbrella may offer advanced features at a higher initial expense.
Appgate SDP is noted for its cost-effectiveness and zero trust network access for identity-based security. In comparison, Cisco Umbrella offers a cloud-native approach with DNS-layer security and extensive integrations, making it suitable for businesses needing comprehensive threat intelligence and multi-layered protection.
Cisco Umbrella excels in DNS-based protection with premium pricing, appealing to those prioritizing extensive feature sets and threat protection. In comparison, Fortinet FortiGate SWG offers robust security with excellent cost-effectiveness, ideal for enterprises focused on performance and budget-friendly solutions.
Cisco Umbrella typically has lower setup costs, while Fortinet FortiGate SWG may require higher initial investment, distinguishing their pricing structures.
Cisco Umbrella typically has lower setup costs, while Fortinet FortiGate SWG may require higher initial investment, distinguishing their pricing structures.
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway offers detailed customization and reporting, appealing to those needing granular controls. In comparison, Cisco Umbrella focuses on user-friendly deployment and ease of integration, catering to hybrid work structures needing efficient DNS-layer protection.
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway has a higher setup cost compared to Cisco Umbrella, highlighting clear differences in initial investment requirements for users.
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway has a higher setup cost compared to Cisco Umbrella, highlighting clear differences in initial investment requirements for users.
Cisco Umbrella offers features like security posture checks and content filtering, ideal for hybrid work environments with seamless management. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks DNS Security provides comprehensive threat protection with built-in firewall features suited for organizations needing enhanced DNS-based attack defense.
Cisco Umbrella offers robust DNS-based protection, ideal for hybrid work environments. In comparison, Fortinet FortiProxy excels in granular web access control and traffic inspection. Tech buyers may choose Umbrella for cloud integration or FortiProxy for cost-effective web security and detailed policy controls.
Cisco Umbrella excels in DNS-based protection and seamless integration, suitable for those needing network security enhancements. In comparison, Perception Point Advanced Email Security focuses on precise threat detection. Users seeking strong email security will appreciate its detection accuracy and reasonable pricing.
Cisco Umbrella has notably cheaper initial setup costs compared to Perception Point Advanced Email Security, making it a more cost-effective option for initial deployment.
Cisco Umbrella has notably cheaper initial setup costs compared to Perception Point Advanced Email Security, making it a more cost-effective option for initial deployment.
Cisco Umbrella offers comprehensive DNS security ideal for mid-sized organizations with resource constraints. In comparison, Versa SASE provides robust routing and firewall capabilities for enterprise-level networks with heavy traffic, appealing to those needing advanced integration and application prioritization features.
Cisco Umbrella presents a straightforward setup with minimal costs, whereas Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform can involve higher initial expenses due to its comprehensive security features.
Cisco Umbrella presents a straightforward setup with minimal costs, whereas Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform can involve higher initial expenses due to its comprehensive security features.
Cisco Umbrella excels in DNS-layer security and integrations, appealing to organizations needing fast deployment. In comparison, Axis Security's zero-trust approach and competitive pricing attract budget-conscious buyers prioritizing flexibility and support, offering a compelling option for maximizing return on investment in specific contexts.
Cisco Umbrella offers a straightforward setup with moderate costs, while Axis Security involves a more complex installation with higher initial expenses, highlighting distinct budget implications for potential users.
Cisco Umbrella offers a straightforward setup with moderate costs, while Axis Security involves a more complex installation with higher initial expenses, highlighting distinct budget implications for potential users.
Cisco Umbrella offers DNS-based security adaptability, making it suitable for diverse organizational applications. In comparison, Symantec Proxy excels with accurate URL filtering and categorization for threat detection. Both have distinct pricing models that impact user experience and perceived ROI.
Cisco Umbrella has a straightforward setup cost, while Symantec Proxy's setup is more complex, highlighting a significant difference. This distinction underscores the choices organizations might consider when evaluating these security solutions.
Cisco Umbrella has a straightforward setup cost, while Symantec Proxy's setup is more complex, highlighting a significant difference. This distinction underscores the choices organizations might consider when evaluating these security solutions.
Cisco Umbrella provides cost-effective DNS-layer security and seamless cloud management. In comparison, Menlo Protect, with its web isolation technology, offers robust security. Tech buyers may prefer Cisco for affordability, while others might choose Menlo for its advanced security capabilities and innovation.
Cisco Umbrella appeals to budget-conscious buyers with competitive pricing and strong support. In comparison, Akamai Edge DNS attracts organizations seeking deep feature sets and robust functionality, where its high initial cost delivers long-term ROI in performance and scalability-focused environments.
Cisco Umbrella offers a lower initial setup cost, providing a cost-effective option, while Akamai Edge DNS requires a higher initial investment, highlighting its comprehensive service features.
Cisco Umbrella offers a lower initial setup cost, providing a cost-effective option, while Akamai Edge DNS requires a higher initial investment, highlighting its comprehensive service features.
Cisco Umbrella excels in scalability and user interface simplicity, ideal for businesses prioritizing ease of use and threat intelligence. In comparison, Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense targets advanced security needs, offering deep integration and comprehensive protection features for enterprises willing to invest in robust solutions.
Cisco Umbrella shows a lower setup cost compared to Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense, which tends to have a higher initial expenditure. This cost difference may influence decisions for budget-conscious organizations seeking efficient threat protection solutions.
Cisco Umbrella shows a lower setup cost compared to Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense, which tends to have a higher initial expenditure. This cost difference may influence decisions for budget-conscious organizations seeking efficient threat protection solutions.
Cisco Umbrella excels in rapid deployment and economic pricing, attracting buyers focused on efficiency. In comparison, Forcepoint ONE, with higher setup costs, offers advanced threat analytics for buyers prioritizing comprehensive data security. Cisco's swift setup contrasts with Forcepoint's thorough configuration requirements, emphasizing respective deployment preferences.
Cisco Umbrella offers comprehensive DNS-based protection with malware prevention and domain security analysis. In comparison, Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway excels in SaaS platform integration and role-based permissions, providing advantages for cloud-focused organizations. Cisco's cost-effective licensing contrasts with Netskope's feature-rich but higher pricing.
Cisco Umbrella has a straightforward setup cost structure, while Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway offers flexible pricing options. Cisco's clarity in setup contrasts with Netskope's adaptable approach, highlighting different cost strategies for these security solutions.
Cisco Umbrella has a straightforward setup cost structure, while Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway offers flexible pricing options. Cisco's clarity in setup contrasts with Netskope's adaptable approach, highlighting different cost strategies for these security solutions.
Cisco Umbrella offers broad security features like domain history tracking and strong DNS-based attack protection, making it ideal for large organizations. In comparison, TitanHQ WebTitan stands out for its simplicity and budget-friendly pricing, appealing to SMBs seeking customizable web filtering solutions.
Cisco Umbrella has a higher initial setup cost compared to TitanHQ WebTitan, making WebTitan a more budget-friendly option for users prioritizing lower initial expenditure.
Cisco Umbrella has a higher initial setup cost compared to TitanHQ WebTitan, making WebTitan a more budget-friendly option for users prioritizing lower initial expenditure.
Trend Micro Web Security offers cost-effective pricing and essential support, making it appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Cisco Umbrella provides advanced features and easy integration, appealing to those seeking superior functionality despite a higher price point.
Cisco Umbrella provides straightforward cloud-based DNS protection with ease of integration. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP DNS excels in traffic management for large environments. Cisco offers competitive pricing and fast ROI, while F5 presents value through a comprehensive feature set despite higher costs.
Cisco Umbrella offers straightforward integration with strong cloud-based security. In comparison, EfficientIP DNS Guardian requires intensive deployment yet excels with advanced DNS security and adaptive response. While Cisco is cost-effective short-term, EfficientIP provides robust features for long-term security investment.
Cisco Umbrella's setup costs are lower, offering affordability, while EfficientIP DNS Guardian's higher setup fees reflect its more comprehensive features, highlighting a clear cost-effectiveness distinction.
Cisco Umbrella's setup costs are lower, offering affordability, while EfficientIP DNS Guardian's higher setup fees reflect its more comprehensive features, highlighting a clear cost-effectiveness distinction.
Menlo Secure excels with threat isolation and competitive pricing, appealing to budget-conscious buyers seeking straightforward deployment. In comparison, Cisco Umbrella attracts those needing a comprehensive feature set, with robust security offerings and strong customer support that justifies its higher cost.
Cisco Umbrella offers robust threat intelligence and cloud-based security ideal for scalable networks. In comparison, Heimdal Endpoint Security emphasizes proactive threat prevention and superior endpoint detection, appealing to those needing real-time protection and comprehensive technical support for deeper configuration.
Cisco Umbrella's strong security with DNS-layer defense makes it ideal for robust protection, while NordLayer's flexibility in access management enhances existing infrastructure. In comparison, NordLayer's adaptable pricing and scalability attract those needing versatility, whereas Cisco Umbrella's comprehensive network security justifies its costs.
Cisco Umbrella generally incurs higher setup costs compared to NordLayer, offering a more extensive security suite. In contrast, NordLayer provides a cost-effective setup with strong baseline features, making it a budget-friendly option.
Cisco Umbrella generally incurs higher setup costs compared to NordLayer, offering a more extensive security suite. In contrast, NordLayer provides a cost-effective setup with strong baseline features, making it a budget-friendly option.
Cisco Umbrella provides extensive integration and robust threat intelligence, making it suitable for larger enterprises. In comparison, DNSFilter offers AI-driven protection and competitive pricing, appealing to businesses valuing straightforward deployment and affordability without requiring extensive security features.
Cisco Umbrella excels in DNS-layer security with customizable web filtering for compliance. In comparison, Forcepoint CASB emphasizes cloud application security with strong integration and management features. Buyers may choose Umbrella for DNS capabilities and easy deployment or Forcepoint for cloud control and integration.
Cisco Umbrella offers a straightforward setup process with competitive initial costs, while Forcepoint CASB requires a more complex setup, potentially increasing the initial investment.
Cisco Umbrella offers a straightforward setup process with competitive initial costs, while Forcepoint CASB requires a more complex setup, potentially increasing the initial investment.
Cisco Umbrella offers cost-effectiveness with easy integration and strong DNS security. In comparison, Akamai Secure Internet Access Enterprise justifies higher costs with advanced threat protection and scalability. Cisco appeals with rapid deployment, while Akamai attracts those seeking extensive web security and scalability.
Proofpoint Cloud App Security Broker excels in protecting SaaS applications, offering advanced data loss prevention. In comparison, Cisco Umbrella focuses on DNS-layer network security with strong threat intelligence. Proofpoint suits SaaS-focused needs, while Cisco Umbrella appeals to those prioritizing network security.
Proofpoint Cloud App Security Broker often incurs higher setup costs, while Cisco Umbrella typically involves a more cost-efficient setup, highlighting a notable difference in initial financial commitment between the two security solutions.
Proofpoint Cloud App Security Broker often incurs higher setup costs, while Cisco Umbrella typically involves a more cost-efficient setup, highlighting a notable difference in initial financial commitment between the two security solutions.
Cisco Umbrella provides robust domain protection with detailed visibility, appealing to organizations with Cisco infrastructure. In comparison, BlueCat Edge offers extensive DNS control through advanced routing capabilities, making it ideal for large-scale operations needing DNS query transparency and manipulation flexibility.
